19.04.2016Hotell Euroopa konverentsikeskus, Tallinn
The Estonian War Museum’s 7th Annual Baltic Military History Conference “Visions of War: Experience, Imagination and Predictions of War in the Past and the Present”
The history conference of 2016 at the Estonian War Museum discussed visions of war and predictions of the future in the armed forces, among the security and defence establishment and in society at large. Why have some armed forces been more successful than the others? How should one learn from the past and make accurate predictions? What does it take to innovate successfully? Why should soldiers and security experts learn from civilian visionaries, publicists, writers and even futurologists?
Papers and panel proposals were encouraged to focus on the following topics:
armed forces and lessons learned from history in the past, the present and in the future
prognoses of future war (including societal and technological changes) in military affairs
visions of future war in the media, literature, the arts and sciences
lessons of the past and predictions about the future in doctrinal development
visions of the future in military education and training
Dr Dmitar Tasic (University College Dublin) – “”We Weren’t Preparing for this Kind of War…” Yugoslav Peoples Army Doctrine and Wars for Yugoslav Succession, 1991-1999″
Hellar Lill (Estonian War Museum) – “Models from the Past and Visions of the Future in the Development of the Estonian Defence Policy, 1991–1999”
Dr James S. Corum (Salford University) – “The US Model of War 1990s to the Present – Wrond Assumptions leading to Strategic Failure”
Dr Tamir Libel (Barcelona Institute of International Studies) – “Comparing Contemporary European Professional Military Education: Drivers and Agents of Change”
Dr Daniel M. Rogrigues (IE University, Spain) – “Conflict Prospects in Popular Culture: TV Series, Movies and Future Visions of War”
Dr Lukasz Kamienski (Jagiellonian University of Kraków) – “Will G.I. Stand for Genetic Infantryman? Genetics, Genomics, and the Prospects of Human Enhancement in the U.S. Military”